🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding the comments made by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's victory over Taylor Fritz in the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is American, Fowler is American – and sports often encourage nationalism. A little bit of disappointment would have been appropriate. Rather, he invoked the continued absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone love a storyline, myself included. But really. Even if the American had beaten Djokovic for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, who he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he someway survived that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven major titles (plus Alcaraz went on to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the next round). Fritz said in press following his defeat that he actually liked his path, because it presented the chance to defeat the top three competitors in the world back-to-back. He is more than justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match who else sensibly had the lack of American champions on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the global rankings entering the upcoming year-end championships and has won his last six matches over No 3 the German with increasing ease. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. His elite delivery and powerful power on both forehand and backhand are more than enough to dispose of most opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, though, he is often helpless. The past few years has seen the interesting rise of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising speed and grace of much shorter players. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was dictating, and playing a soft shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That acts as a quite severe limitation on his potential.

The American has made a several dramatic, improbable improvements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years after, he was approaching the top 10. The previous season, he suddenly surged to fourth place – and held the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and beating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing slump of American men lifting major titles when Fritz had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

The American's play in that very quarter-final should have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian won in four rounds, a win that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a few championship opportunities and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz earning numerous opportunities to break. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after break point, extending the streak to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly produced a horrendous service game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle secondary to the main contest and compelled him to expend excessive energy to win it. Down set points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve floated to heaven. He prolonged the contest two times on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, only a consequence of needing to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite compelling evidence that Fritz is not good enough to beat any version of Djokovic, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and never particularly appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities now, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is those who were anticipating the American to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that suggested he would.

Fritz is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in media sessions, more so than virtually everyone on the ATP aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just say how he feels or the strategy he felt determined a contest, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for America failing to spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unfair. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely dwell on it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed an interviewer in June of winning a major. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying reign is in fact extremely improbable for all other players. {